“The architect of the Chagos Islands deal is reportedly on the verge of stepping down as Sir Keir Starmer’s National Security Adviser. Jonathan Powell is said to be considering leaving his Downing Street post before the end of the year in a further significant departure from the Prime Minister’s team. Since last Sunday, Sir Keir has lost Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff, Sir Chris Wormald, his Cabinet Secretary, and Tim Allan, his communications chief. All three left in the wake of the Mandelson-Epstein revelations. Mr Powell’s deal to hand over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius is highly controversial. It led to a political row after it emerged that Britain would pay £35bn over 99 years to lease back Diego Garcia, which hosts a military base. According to The Guardian, Mr Powell rejected an offer to replace Mr McSweeney as chief of staff, saying he did not want to go back to the job he had under Sir Tony Blair. He instead plans to return to a lucrative consultancy he set up in 2011. Mr Powell also helped broker Sir Keir’s closer relationship with China, which culminated in the Prime Minister’s visit last month. However, his position came under scrutiny late last year following the collapse of the trial of two men accused of spying for Beijing.” – Daily Telegraph
Comment:
“More than 70 boat migrants who had mobiles seized when reaching the UK have won payouts totalling £500,000. High Court judges ruled nabbing the phones and data was illegal and in breach of European human rights laws. It is feared 1,300 migrants may apply for compensation and the sum could run to millions. So far £210,800 has been awarded to 32 asylum seekers — £6,587.50 each. Reform MP Robert Jenrick said: “It is a farce and total waste of taxpayers’ money.” Critics last night branded the decision “farcical” — as it emerged the bill could soar to millions. But government officials confirmed that another 41 cases were in the pipeline. If they receive the same via their claims, it will send the compensation bill spiralling to £480,887. It also cost the Home Office £735,000 to fight the case, a Freedom of Information probe found. High Court judges Lord Justice Edis and Mr Justice Lane delivered a 2022 ruling that the policy was illegal and breached the European Convention on Human Rights.” – The Sun
“More than a third of employers are set to cut back on hiring because of the government’s workers’ rights reforms, a survey of employers has found. Businesses warned that new rules giving enhanced protections to workers will place a “further handbrake on job creation” after they were hit by an increase to national insurance last April. The survey, carried out by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), found that 37 per cent of 2,000 firms polled planned to reduce the recruitment of new permanent staff as a result of the changes. It also found that more than half of businesses expected an increase in workplace conflict… Government economists have estimated that the Employment Rights Act, spearheaded by Angela Rayner before she resigned over her tax affairs last year, will cost businesses about £1 billion a year. Yet the CIPD, the UK trade body for human resources departments, said that analysis did “not fully account” for the amount of time HR teams would spend on implementing the changes. Ben Willmott, head of public policy at the institute, said there was a risk that the new measures would “act as a further handbrake on job creation and recruitment” on top of the £24 billion increase to employers’ national insurance contributions introduced last year.” – The Times
Comment:
“Sir Keir Starmer is to fast-track powers that could ban under-16s from social media in an attempt to head off a backbench rebellion. The Prime Minister has pledged measures that would allow the Government to introduce a law enacting an Australian-style social media ban as early as this summer. He is facing a rebellion by up to 60 Labour MPs who want children banned from social media. In the Lords last month, peers backed a rebel amendment forcing the immediate introduction of a ban. However, Sir Keir’s assurances over new powers may head off a major backbench revolt at a time when he is facing questions over his leadership in the wake of revelations about Lord Mandelson. He said: “As a dad of two teenagers, I know the challenges and worries parents face making sure their kids are safe online. Technology is moving really fast, and the law has got to keep up. Today we are closing loopholes that put children at risk, and laying the groundwork for further action.” … The move would allow ministers to ban social media for youngsters if it was backed by a three-month consultation due to start next month. This will mean that, instead of having to wait to draft new legislation, Sir Keir would be able to act swiftly on the issue. It comes after he was forced into more than a dozen policy about-turns, including scrapping the two-child benefit cap, ditching plans for higher business rates on pubs and agreeing to a national inquiry into grooming gangs.” – Daily Telegraph
Comment: