As it never attracted as much ire as Iraq we may never see a proper inquiry into a decades-long, £27.7 billion failure.
Loyalty works both ways: ministers should widen existing schemes for Afghans so they match the generosity of those available to Ukrainians.
Removing the leader of Al-Qaeda is welcome. But it will not undo the damage the last twenty years have done to America’s reputation in the eyes of the young.
The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition were today unable even to agree what the questions should be.
Why did the Foreign Office fail in this case, but succeed over Ukraine, in the view of some of its critics?
He is a liberal on the run, never stopping for long enough in one place to be pinned down, but soaring instead into the higher platitudes.
We have a legal duty to intervene if chemical weapons are used, and that is a duty we must not fail.
And if he is strong and the West weak, why has his Ukraine invasion gone wrong – and why are our governments showing unity and resolution?
In financial sanctions and diplomatic recognition, the West has the tools to drive change in Kabul this International Women’s Day.
The conventional war on the Central European landmass unfolding before us is a massive international event – comparable in security terms to a 9/11.
Is the British public remotedly prepared for possible cyber attacks aimed at our national infrastructure?
And: surely Johnson wants to know who authorised the Nowzad instruction. Plus: go on – make it all about Brexit.
A Foreign Office civil servant said one thing and Downing Street says another. What happened?
The High Court’s judgement earlier this week marks a major step forward in our plans and we are focused on moving ahead with the policy as soon as possible.