The Attorney General on judges, Asian values, Spartans, the Good Law Project, Lord Frost – and why the Tories should revive the torch logo.
The public has been subjected to two years of relentless bombardment about disease and death in this dystopian experiment.
A new ConHome series offering a very short introduction to some of those who are making or who have made an intellectual contribution to conservatism.
Elections, referenda and political fora are the appropriate settings for such debate, not the courts.
During the last year, we’ve learned much about the Government – but far more about ourselves.
The dubious legal basis for lockdown restrictions should be clarified by making its scope explicit.
We knew that even the prospect of one would widen and deepen debate on Coronavirus policy – which was essential.
For many lawyers and commentators, its ruling was an assertion of judicial power that cannot be justified by constitutional law or principle.
The political has been captured by the legal. Decisions of an executive, legislative and democratic nature have been assumed by our courts.
Take the case of a Nigerian national who was sentenced in 2016 to four years in prison for offences including possessing crack cocaine and heroin with the intention to supply. The First-tier Tribunal allowed his appeal against deportation on grounds deportation was irreconcilable with Article 8.